The claimant reports that renovation work stopped after demolition and that scheduled materials were not delivered. The contractor says the project paused after a scope disagreement.
The claimant completed private identity verification. This does not prove the claim.
A signed synthetic contract links both parties to the project.
Documents were checked for relevance and safe handling, not adjudicated as true.
The contractor disputes material parts of the report.
The agreed first phase included demolition, wiring and material delivery. Only demolition was completed. I supplied the signed quote, transfer record and dated site photographs.
Harbor Buildworks says the customer changed the electrical scope and denied access on two dates. It disputes the refund amount and has offered independent measurement of completed work.View subject record →
Raw files, private identifiers and unrelated third-party details are not exposed.
Scope, milestones and payment schedule.
Redacted record of the advance payment.
Dated images reviewed in the private evidence vault.
This derivative demonstrates how useful proof can be shared without publishing phone numbers, signatures, payment credentials or raw metadata.
Contract and payment connection reviewed.
Fourteen-day response window opened.
Scope and access issues disputed.
No conclusion of fraud made by Quibble.
Independent site measurement offered as next step.